As per media reports, the Supreme Court on Tuesday came down heavily on comedian Samay Raina, observing that he had violated its earlier directions and “taken the court for a ride” in the case concerning offensive remarks about persons with disabilities.
During the hearing, the apex court remarked that those who fail to respect the sentiments of members of society must face the consequences of their actions. Initially, the Bench directed Samay Raina to pay a fine of Rs 10 lakh.
However, after Raina’s counsel pleaded for one final opportunity and sought leniency, the court reduced the fine to Rs 3 lakh. At the same time, it issued a stern warning that the amount could be increased to Rs 30 lakh if the court is not satisfied with compliance by the next hearing.
The matter stems from proceedings initiated last year, when the Supreme Court summoned five influencers and stand-up comedians, including Samay Raina, over alleged offensive and derogatory remarks targeting persons with disabilities. The controversial comments were made during the show India’s Got Latent.
At the time, the court had made it clear that speech demeaning any community or class of people would not be tolerated. Instead of imposing only a punitive measure, it directed the comedians to organize monthly fundraising shows on their platforms, highlighting inspiring stories of specially abled individuals.
According to media reports, Chief Justice Surya Kant had earlier observed that the direction was intended as a “social burden” rather than a “penal burden,” stating that public figures should use their popularity to create a positive impact.
The latest hearing also saw submissions from Cure SMA Foundation, which had approached the court seeking action against the content creators over what it described as insensitive remarks against persons with disabilities.
Appearing for the Foundation, advocate Aparajita Singh informed the court that although some events involving specially abled individuals had been organized, the Foundation itself had not been contacted despite the court’s earlier directions. She also questioned the sincerity of Samay Raina’s apology.
Responding to the allegation, Samay Raina’s counsel submitted that they did not have the Foundation’s address and therefore could not establish contact. The lawyer assured the court that the issue would be addressed and that the comedian would comply with the directions in the future.
The matter will now be taken up at a later date, when the Supreme Court will review whether its directions have been fully complied with.
